Monday, March 30, 2009

The sound of cracking ice..........


You know that instantly sick to your stomach feeling you get from a near automobile crash? That is the feeling many are getting now from the sound of cracking ice..........



Traditionally, punditry in Washington has been a cozy business. To get the inside scoop, big-time columnists sometimes befriend top policymakers and offer informal advice over lunch or drinks. Naturally, lines can blur. The most noted pundit of mid-20th-century Washington, Walter Lippmann, was known to help a president write a speech—and then to write a newspaper column praising the speech.

Paul Krugman has all the credentials of a ranking member of the East Coast liberal establishment: a column in The New York Times, a professorship at Princeton, a Nobel Prize in economics. He is the type you might expect to find holding forth at a Georgetown cocktail party or chumming around in the White House Mess of a Democratic administration. But in his published opinions, and perhaps in his very being, he is anti-establishment. Though he was a scourge of the Bush administration, he has been critical, if not hostile, to the Obama White House.

In his twice-a-week column and his blog, Conscience of a Liberal, he criticizes the Obamaites for trying to prop up a financial system that he regards as essentially a dead man walking. In conversation, he portrays Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and other top officials as, in effect, tools of Wall Street (a ridiculous charge, say Geithner defenders). These men and women have "no venality," Krugman hastened to say in an interview with NEWSWEEK. But they are suffering from "osmosis," from simply spending too much time around investment bankers and the like. In his Times column the day Geithner announced the details of the administration's bank-rescue plan, Krugman described his "despair" that Obama "has apparently settled on a financial plan that, in essence, assumes that banks are fundamentally sound and that bankers know what they're doing. It's as if the president were determined to confirm the growing perception that he and his economic team are out of touch, that their economic vision is clouded by excessively close ties to Wall Street."

If you are of the establishment persuasion (and I am), reading Krugman makes you uneasy. You hope he's wrong, and you sense he's being a little harsh (especially about Geithner), but you have a creeping feeling that he knows something that others cannot, or will not, see. By definition, establishments believe in propping up the existing order. Members of the ruling class have a vested interest in keeping things pretty much the way they are. Safeguarding the status quo, protecting traditional institutions, can be healthy and useful, stabilizing and reassuring. But sometimes, beneath the pleasant murmur and tinkle of cocktails, the old guard cannot hear the sound of ice cracking.



http://www.newsweek.com/id/191393


© Janet Crain

Click here to view all recent Sarah Palin in 2012 posts

Bookmark and Share

2 comments:

keyboard.jockey said...

Janet

If A Liberal is saying this then it is ten times worse then what he is portraying the situation...like I linked in TGIF KaRN EvIL, Carny Jargon, the games rigged, all the games all the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carny

Gaff - To rig a game so as to make it unwinnable

Why worry, what could go wrong with a bunch of Lawyers running the country/sarc.

keyboard.jockey said...

Neil Cavuto of FBN on Imus in the Morning, this morning, we should be following the Swedish Model:)

Neil Cavuto SAABing to Imus.

http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/04/neil-cavuto-saabing-to-imus.html