Showing posts with label CEO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CEO. Show all posts

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Whole Foods CEO Has a Better Idea...........


The health care debate has been raging for months now, and all we hear is the government ran health program is the only option for the country.

However, the CEO of Whole Foods has something to say about health care takeover, and it is actually the right solution to the problem:


While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment. Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:
Cont.here:




© Janet Crain

Click here to view all recent Sarah Palin in 2012 posts

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Why Can't Tarp Money be Returned?

Obama Wants to Control the Banks

There's a reason he refuses to accept repayment of TARP money.


I must be naive. I really thought the administration would welcome the return of bank bailout money. Some $340 million in TARP cash flowed back this week from four small banks in Louisiana, New York, Indiana and California. This isn't much when we routinely talk in trillions, but clearly that money has not been wasted or otherwise sunk down Wall Street's black hole. So why no cheering as the cash comes back?

My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell 'em what to do. Control. Direct. Command.

It is not for nothing that rage has been turned on those wicked financiers. The banks are at the core of the administration's thrust: By managing the money, government can steer the whole economy even more firmly down the left fork in the road.

If the banks are forced to keep TARP cash -- which was often forced on them in the first place -- the Obama team can work its will on the financial system to unprecedented degree. That's what's happening right now.

Here's a true story first reported by my Fox News colleague Andrew Napolitano (with the names and some details obscured to prevent retaliation). Under the Bush team a prominent and profitable bank, under threat of a damaging public audit, was forced to accept less than $1 billion of TARP money. The government insisted on buying a new class of preferred stock which gave it a tiny, minority position. The money flowed to the bank. Arguably, back then, the Bush administration was acting for purely economic reasons. It wanted to recapitalize the banks to halt a financial panic.

Cont. here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123879833094588163.html


© Janet Crain

Click here to view all recent Sarah Palin in 2012 posts

Bookmark and Share

SNL Parody Hits Close to the Truth.....




© Janet Crain

Click here to view all recent Sarah Palin in 2012 posts

Bookmark and Share

Monday, March 30, 2009

Why GE???

by David Sirota
So here's the question: Can anyone explain the differing treatment of auto companies and Wall Street firms? Is it just that there are far more Wall Street worshipers like Tim Geithner and Larry Summers in the Obama administration than auto industry representatives? Or is it something else?

The Associated Press reports that "General Motors Corp. Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner will step down immediately at the request of the White House, U.S. administration officials said Sunday." I'm not sure that's a good or bad thing, but I am curious about why the White House would make such a bold demand of a car company the federal government is lending to, but not a similar demand of the banks the federal government partially owns?

What I mean is - how is it that the White House is requesting the resignation of GM's CEO while not doing the same of, say, Bank of America's CEO? In fact, not only is the president not demanding the resignation of bank CEOs, he's actually hosting them for photo ops at the White House. Sure, I know some bank CEOs resigned a few months ago under shareholder pressure, but the Obama administration has never publicly demanded such resignations of the current management that is making the problems worse, nor the resignation of management at the biggest firms (Goldman Sachs, BofA, etc.) that are still in place.

Working Class Democrat comments:

I'm beginning to concede that Obama is worrisome. While it is too early to judge him on his actions, it is not too early to begin to see a pattern. There is a part of me that fears a Manchurian Candidate. There has been precious little for the working man up to this point and Obama may be looking to Kent Conrad to get him out of his campaign promise to bring us a National Health Care program. It's worrisome.




Obama doesn't care anything about working class Americans. Remember how he and Biden turned up their noses and snarled through clenched teeth; "He's a plumber". As if there were nothing worse than plumbers. When in truth, any honest work is to be admired. I daresay none of the elites in DC can fix a toilet or anything else, these days. Janet Crain


Click here to view all recent Sarah Palin in 2012 posts

Bookmark and Share